|
|
|
Everywhere,
your ID and database information will be checked by CCTV and mobile
hand-held devices
ID Cards not needed
|
|
|
|
campaign links | media articles
| publications | manufacturers
|
These resources suggest that biometric facial recognition
would be part of a UK ID Card National Database Register and will be integral
to a global system of biometric passports, without the need of additional
regulation. But why does the recent speech by David Blunkett(1)
and commentary by Tony Blair(2),
the ID Card Bill(3) and its Explanatory notes(4)
make no specific reference to facial biometrics? With the Race Equality
and Regulatory Impact Assessments(5) making
scant commentary. Could it be that, from 2005,(6)
they will form part of the newly issued UK passports and therefore not
much explicit comment is needed?
Further material:
Online demonstration of an automatic facial recognition system
Demo
Online demo of automatic facial recognition: http://www.biodentity.com/newsite2/intro.swf
- If needed, download a flash player to view: http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download...
Video of minister confirming the intention to use biometric facial,
fingerprint and iris ID systems
"we doubt whether the pressure to use (an automatic
biometric facial recognition system)...could be resisted forever by future
governments"
Home
Affairs committee: July 2004 (6 months not too
long then...?)
Question: "How are you going to check?" (Audience
member)
Answer: "We will have a completely clean [ database
] and when you have your ID Cards we will then have [ fingerprints
], we then have the possibility of [ facial recognition ],
we will also have the possibility of [ iris recognition ],
so we will actually be able to see who you say you are..."
Hazel Blears MP: Home Office Minister of State for counter-terrorism,
resilience issues, crime reduction, policing and community safety.
BBC Question Time 2 December 2004
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/4064217.stm
Comments on the move toward compulsory ID Cards
Move towards compulsory ID cards
"It is thought they would be based on the Applicant Registration
Cards (ARC), launched for all new asylum seekers last week"
5 February 2002
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1802847.stm
Concerns about a database surveillance society
Government databases risk surveillance society, says Information Commissioner
"The UK is in danger of 'sleepwalking into a surveillance society'
according to data protection watchdog Richard Thomas. In an interview
with The Times, Information Commissioner Richard Thomas echoed Computing's
Data Debate campaign about the unco-ordinated proliferation of government
databases including the planned identity card register, the citizen information
project and the database of all children. Thomas is also critical of the
government's lack of clarity over plans for ID cards.
http://www.computing.co.uk/news/1157343
Lack of regulations over use of CCTV and automatic facial recognition
in public places
Despite government assurances about ID Cards
and function creep, CCTV remains virtually unregulated and CCTV facial
recognition systems are already used extensively by public authorities
throughout the UK, so what would stop any facial biometric taken under
the ID Card scheme not being used in mass CCTV surveillance or Law enforcement?
After all the idea that our civil rights will be protected(7)
by ID Cards suggests that the biometric data provided must get checked
by the state in an organised and technological way.

Current biometric database fingerprint checking of the public
Is the recent checking of fingerprint biometrics on London's
underground public transport system an indicator of the future of automatic
CCTV biometric facial recognition?
Police State
"The impact of these spot checks should not be underestimated.
Immigration officials (clad in body armour and carrying handcuffs)
question suspects for up to 40 minutes, in full view of other passengers,
while their details are checked on wireless laptops and fingerprint-scanning
(biometric) technology linked to national databases.The police
and immigration services have combined in a new "street sweep"
operation that targets passengers on the London Underground and passers-by
in the street. Their crime? Looking foreign."
http://www.asylumpolicy.info/policestate.htm
and
Excuse me
are you British?
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/are-you-british-.shtml
Watching your every move
There are 2.5 million CCTV cameras in the UK
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1789157.stm
Racism and technological segregation
Racism is overt and covert and often evidenced by the
denial of services, could this mean a new form of racism based on the
idea that only if you have the 'right' biometrics will you have access
to public services and the right to work, for example? The concept of
'race' is pseudo-scientific, will the science of biometrics create a new
form of 'race' resulting in an absolute form of segregation achieved through
technology?
Internal immigration controls for everyone
The end of ID Cards and automatic database ID checks by CCTV and hand-held
mobile devices
The basis of these comments are that Mr Blunkett said
that the ID Cards would eventually not be needed, or 'superfluous'
in his words and that they would 'protect our civil liberties'. As well
as the observation that most of the media and public debate surrounds
the actual issues of any compulsion to show an ID Card and the situations
were the police and others could ask to see a card or impose penalties
for not showing or having a card. This ignores how, currently manufactured(8),
hand-held and CCTV devices can be used to verify a persons biometrics,
were they are contained on a database. Therefore our civil liberties could
end up being 'protected', not by having and showing an ID Card, but our
willingness to have our database biometrics checked, which seems to invoke
additional issues. Especially as CCTV facial recognition could be carried
out without knowledge or consent, as is the current practice of many public
authorities and private companies throughout the UK and elsewhere. In
July 2004 the House of Commons Home Affairs committee asked about how
many biometric readers would be needed and said that the use of 'facial
recognition technology' could not be 'resisted' forever.
"It is also likely that that facial recognition
technology will develop to the point where an individual captured on
a CCTV camera could potentially be identified from the National Identity
Register. Again, we doubt whether the pressure to use the system in
this way could be resisted forever by future governments."
Home
Affairs Committee
"We don't know how many
biometric readers will be needed
"
Home
Affairs Committee
Whilst there are indicators of a general acceptance of ID Cards, this
acceptance only seems to relate to a questions about possession of a card,
not the full potential of automatic biometric checking and recognition
when such a card became 'superfluous'?
"Eight in 10 (80%) of the adult British population say they are
in favour of ID cards, and slightly more (83%) say they would be happy
to carry the card at all times."
http://www.mori.com/pubinfo/rmw/a-question-of-identity.shtml
Maybe a poll could be undertaken to ask whether people would accept mass
surveillance through biometric technology and whether people would be
happy to be submitted to the kinds of biometric checks that regularly
take place on London Public Transport. Not to mention the current use
of CCTV automatic facial recognition cameras in a street near you today!
"Cameras are combined with databases using 'facial recognition
technology' to scan and automatically identify people's faces in crowds."
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/privacy/cctv.shtml
Conclusion: Resistance is futile
Will it be futile to resist these developments or are we to live in a
Big Brother surveillance society that even George Orwell could not have
imagined?
Campaign links:
No2ID
http://www.no2id.com/
Stand
http://www.stand.org.uk/
Media reports:
'State racism' fears over ID cards
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/uk_politics/2094000.stm
How your face could open doors (or keep them closed)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4035285.stm
Publications:
JCWI: Electronic monitoring of asylum seekers
Article:
http://www.jcwi.org.uk/currentnews/Electronic%20monitoring%20article.pdf
Press statement:
http://www.jcwi.org.uk/currentnews/31elecmonstatement.pdf
Fact Sheet
http://www.jcwi.org.uk/currentnews/mediafactsheet
The Refugee Councils response to Government proposals on legislation
on identity cards
http://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/downloads/policy_briefings/id_cards_july04.pdf
Manufacturers
Aurora
" The UKs leading provider of cost-effective software solutions
utilising innovative facial
recognition technologies.
http://www.facerec.com/index.html
BioDentity Systems Corporation
http://www.biodentity.com
identix
http://www.identix.com/
References:
1) Blunket:
Identity Cards Speech
"...the card itself will become superfluous
We think that we should endeavour to use 3 biometric identifiers as a
safeguard for all of us.
Technology (biometric readers?) would allow you simply to move past or
to put 3 or 2 fingers over a particular laser for the identity to be reflected
in terms of the database.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/identitycards_041118speech.htm
2) ID cards 'protect services and improve
security'
http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page6687.asp
3) Identity Cards Bill
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/008/2005008.htm
4) Explanatory Notes: Identity Cards Bill
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/008/en/05008x--.htm
5) Race Equality Impact Assessment: Identity
Cards Bill
"Despite the low levels of knowledge regarding biometric information,
the majority of UK respondents were in favour of providing all three of
the types of
biometric details (fingerprints, a facial digital photograph, and an iris
digital photograph) at least 75% in each case.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/reia_241104.pdf
Note: Do these 'levels of knowledge' indicate informed consent?
Or offer assurance that 'UK respondents' were making a distinction between
a standard digital photo and the technology used to create biometric facial
images for automatic recognition?
and
Regulatory Impact Assessment : Identity Cards Bill
"As with any project of this size and complexity there is a great
deal of development work to be done before it is possible to finalise
all the operational details, including the precise technical arrangements
for recording biometric identifiers such as facial image, finger scans
and iris images,which will provide a way of uniquely confirming the identity
of cardholders.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/ria_251104.pdf
Note: The technology is already in use in the UK and the US, with
people seeking asylum in Britain being a testing ground for biometric
ID Cards since January 2002
"The first new high-tech biometric cards for asylum applicants will
come hot off the press today in Croydon."
http://www.asylumsupport.info/news/homeoffice/fingerprints.htm
6) The UKPS biometrics enrolment trial
The UKPS will implement a facial recognition biometric (which can be taken
from a passport photograph) in the British Passport book in accordance
with international standards in 2005.
Biometric collection and recognition Facial recognition,
iris pattern and fingerprint images were nominated the most suitable biometrics
for use at border
controls and passport issuance by the International Civil Aviation Organisation
(ICAO) in May 2003.
http://www.ukps.gov.uk/news/news.asp?strAreaNo=320&intelement=784
Referring to:
ICAO
Biometric Identification to Provide Enhanced Security and Speedier Border
Clearance For Travelling Public
"The face has long been used by border control authorities and airline
staff at airports to confirm identity with a "photo ID". Facial
recognition technology automates this process, using a camera to capture
the image of the face, while a computer validates facial characteristics.
ICAO also has selected high-capacity, contactless integrated circuit (IC)
chips to store identification information in MRTDs -- passports, visas
and identity cards.
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/nr/2003/pio200309.htm
7) Blunkett: ID cards will protect civil liberties
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/n_story.asp?item_id=1150
8) Biometric equipment being used in the UK
Aurora
" The UKs leading provider of cost-effective software solutions
utilising innovative facial
recognition technologies.
http://www.facerec.com/index.html
BioDentity Systems Corporation
http://www.biodentity.com
identix
http://www.identix.com/
9) US Home Land Security Association
http://www.hsianet.org
Published: 1 December 2004 - amended 3/12/04
EXILE: http://www.exile.org.uk
|